![time machine or carbon copy cloner time machine or carbon copy cloner](https://www.theapplelounge.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Carbon-Copy-Cloner-4_9-300x189.jpg)
I think that TM and CCC combination are great.
![time machine or carbon copy cloner time machine or carbon copy cloner](https://www.theapplelounge.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/SNES-Emulator-for-iOS-8-splash-1024x682-768x512.jpg)
because of the inherent weakness in versioning. I tend to think of bootable images as NOT backup. or a subset of your data at a certain date.ĬCC is extremely good at creating a bootable image. TM lets you turn back the clock to recover everything. This is known as versioning.ĬCC does move deleted files into a separate directory structure. You can go back in time and get those pictures, even though you deleted the folder a long time ago. but dont notice it until a year later (say your 2005 beach vacation pictures. The big value of a backup is that it remembers everything that you have ever done. that is exactly what you DON'T want to happen. So were urging you use a backup app routinely, and were recommending that it be one of these: Time Machine, ChronoSync, SuperDuper or Carbon Copy Cloner.
#Time machine or carbon copy cloner download
Download the latest versions of the best Mac apps at safe and trusted MacUpdate Download. CCC keeps all the files in a duplicate folder structure. User reviews for Carbon Copy Cloner 5.1.8 - Easy-to-use backup/cloning utility. You really should not be mucking around inside. Time Machine keeps things in a "sparse bundle". Time Machine is an obvious choice since it already comes built-in with the Mac and it automatically creates a backup of your entire hard drive into a secondary hard drive, which can be anything like a USB drive, an external HDD or SSD, a Thunderbolt hard drive, or an internal hard. It depends upon the program you use for backup. Problem is files on the clone drive may not be up to date. When my disk crash or Mac broke down (spill coffee on keyboard) and I am in hurry to have a system to use, I can bring the CCC clone drive to another Mac, boot it up and I am off on my work. I need to remember to plug in my external drive each time for me to clone the drive.
![time machine or carbon copy cloner time machine or carbon copy cloner](https://www.lifewire.com/thmb/BqCM3PZnUGqjx3Luq9eBYdt3gfE=/2500x1485/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/CCC4-5b354d6b46e0fb0037f8afec.jpg)
TM has all the versions I need when I really mess up with some files.ĬCC on the other hand, is used sparingly to clone my entire drive. Using the NAS approach, you don't have to be reminded about plugging a disk into your machine and start backing up. The "quietly backup behind the scene" is very important because it's human to forget the backup or think "it won't happen to me". So it always happen quietly on the background as long as I am around the NAS's network. I am using NAS and Time Machine backup my Mac over WiFi to the NAS. Learning my hard and painful lesson, I am mixing Time Machine Backup with CCC to get the best of both.
#Time machine or carbon copy cloner software
Bombich Software has released version 6 of Carbon Copy Cloner, the. Of course, Time Machine is limited in how far back in time it can go with the backups, based on the amount of storage space available on the hard drive you’re using as a Time Machine backup.I had been hit few times with disk crashes just when I am about to make a backup from the last of 20+ days before. Apple's built-in Time Machine backup solution for macOS appears to be causing problems for some Mac users running the latest. In Time Machine you could move back in time to a date when that file still existed, and recover the file based on a backup from that date. So, for example, let’s assume you had a file on your desktop that you accidentally deleted. One of the special features of Time Machine compared to a more typical incremental backup is that Time Machine maintains different backup versions over time. Time Machine is a bit different, in that it creates an incremental backup. Ultimately I would have been happy using either product. Based on my testing I simply found that I prefer the workflow and interface in GoodSync. This approach makes it very easy to recover from a hard drive failure, since your backup is essentially an exact copy of the source drive (at least up to the time of your last backup).īoth GoodSync and Carbon Copy Cloner could be used in a similar workflow, and I think both are very good products. More Detail: GoodSync and Carbon Copy Cloner provide very similar features that enable you to maintain a backup that is an exact copy of the source data. Carbon Copy Cloner provides the same basic features, but in testing I simply found that I preferred the workflow and interface in GoodSync. Tim’s Quick Answer: I favor GoodSync ( ) over Time Machine because GoodSync creates an exact backup copy of the source hard drive. Today’s Question: Would you briefly describe why you favor GoodSync over Time Machine or other software such as Carbon Copy Cloner?